Proportionality in Constitutional and Human Rights Interpretation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Do Constitutional Rights Matter?∗
The critique of constitutions as mere parchment barriers is as old as the practice of writing them down. Yet states put a good deal of energy into drafting constitutions and some, inevitably, do so with the intention of abiding by their provisions. The purpose of the following article is to explore this possibility. I develop a theory of constitutional enforcement and test it using data spannin...
متن کاملGetting to Rights: Treaty Ratification, Constitutional Convergence, and Human Rights Practice
This Article examines the adoption of rights in national constitutions in the post-World War II period in light of claims of global convergence. Using a comprehensive database on the contents of the world’s constitutions, we observe a qualified convergence on the content of rights. Nearly every single right has increased in prevalence since its introduction, but very few are close to universal....
متن کاملDo Constitutional Rights Matter? The Relationship between De Jure and De Facto Human Rights Protection∗
The critique of constitutions as mere parchment barriers is as old as the practice of writing them down. Yet states put a good deal of energy into drafting constitutions and, in some cases, do so with the intention of limiting their subsequent behavior. At least some, then, appear to view constitutions as more than merely parchment. The purpose of the following article is to explore this possib...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho
سال: 2013
ISSN: 2448-7937,2007-4387
DOI: 10.22201/iij.24487937e.2013.7.8150